WHISTLEBLOWER KEVIN LINDEBERG’S 8 AUGUST 2013 COMMENTARY RE POST-CARMODY INQUIRY’S 1 JULY 2013 FINDING OF PRIMA FACIE BREACH OF SECTION 129 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE RE SHREDDING OF THE HEINER INQUIRY DOCUMENTS AND TAPES
Whistleblower Kevin Lindeberg – Former public sector trade union organiser
Q: ARE YOU SAYING THAT COMMISSIONER CARMODY’S NARROW DEFINITION OF
‘GOVERNMENT’ EVENTUALLY CAUGHT UP WITH HIM IN TERMS OF HIS FINDING OF A PRIMA FACIE CRIME BY THE LAW NOT BEING ABLE TO BE FULLY APPLIED?
KL: That’s correct. He said at the Recusal Hearing that if he
defined the term “government” to mean “whole of government”, that is,
departments and statutory authorities, then he would have to stand
aside because it would logically mean that he’d have to investigate
himself when he was the Queensland Crime Commissioner in 2001 when I saw
him about the Harding Incident. He accepted that the law does not
permit a party to an allegation to investigate himself.
In other words, after setting the parameters, he couldn’t apply the full scope of section 7 to the
prima face
shredding crime without breaching his own narrow definition of
“government” to just mean “the political executive” because once the
floodgates opened, it flooded everywhere and everything.
The Rofe QC Audit, to all intents and purposes, is the systemic cover-up flooding roadmap.
Full commentary and interview here >>>>>
6 MAY 2013 - A DAY TO REMEMBER
Commissioner Tim Carmody
Some days are just like any other but some may be pivotal in the
lives of individuals, for particular issues or nations because of what
transpires. This can be judged either instantaneously, prospectively or
retrospectively.
On 6 May 2013, in Court 17 of the Brisbane Magistrates Court
Building, never before heard arguments as to whether an entire Cabinet
may be in serious breach of the
Criminal Code were
live-streamed to the world on the internet. Specifically, they
addressed the extraordinary legal question as to whether the 5 March
1990 order by the Queensland Cabinet to destroy the Heiner Inquiry
documents and tapes to,
inter alia, reduce the risk of legal action may have been illegal.
Despite it being nearly a quarter of a century since this shredding
order, its legal consequences remain alive because no statute of
limitations applies.
Presiding over the arguments was Commissioner Tim Carmody SC, head of the Child Protection Commission of Inquiry.
Full commentary here >>>>>
2012 SPECIAL COMMENTARY BY WHISTLEBLOWER KEVIN LINDEBERG
Whistleblower Kevin Lindeberg
Over a long period this webpage has independently drawn together
all material available on the public record which goes to making up
what is now commonly known across Australia and around the world as
“the Heiner Affair.” The whistleblower, Kevin Lindeberg, is not
responsible for its content although it contains most of what he has
written about his public interest disclosures. He has never directly
made a comment on this webpage.
However, due to recent dramatic events, he was approached with a series of relevant questions, and his response is
now published here.>>>>> MOVING TOWARDS THE ENDGAME
Witness confirms pack rape of girl to Heiner Inquiry
John Oxley Youth Detention Centre. Picture: Philip Norrish
Today at the Carmody Inquiry, the Rubicon on the Heiner Affair was irretrievable crossed.
A highly credible witness under oath, Mrs Irene Parfitt, former
Youth Worker at the John Oxley Youth Detention Centre, confirmed the
contents of her police statement that she told Mr Heiner about the pack
rape of Annette Harding when she gave evidence to him in Brisbane
Children's Court at North Quay.
She was, in effect, a whistleblower. She would not tolerate
silence any longer over a burning issue at the Centre for many staff,
and she believed the Heiner Inquiry was the place to make her public
interest disclosure. The assault was a matter which greatly disturbed
her. Notwithstanding some time difficulties expected after the passage
of close to 23 years, she clearly recalled telling Mr Heiner about the
sexual assault of Ms Harding, a 14-year-old indigenous child while in
the care of the State.
Full commentary here >>>>>
Should Commissioner Carmody Have Recused Himself from the QCPCI?
Alleged Prima Facie Criminal Count 57 of the Rofe Audit.
Commissioner Tim Carmody
Section 87 of the Criminal
Code - Official Corruption in regard to the conduct of certain officials
of the Queensland Crime Commission in respect of their handling of the
allegations by one Kevin Lindeberg and related matters at certain times-
That on divers dates between the thirteenth day of December 2001
and the thirty first day of December 2001, at Brisbane in the state of
Queensland, one Timothy Carmody, to the extent of his involvement, being
a holder of office in the Queensland Crime Commission, pursuant to the
Crime Commission Act 1997, at material times, did corruptly confer an
advantage on another in respect the handling of allegations by one Kevin
Lindeberg by failing to act honestly, impartially and in the public
interest.
You be the judge full account of Count 57 of the Rofe Audit here >>>>>
4BC Mornings: Kevin
Lindeberg is an ex Trade Union official. Twenty threre years ago he was
involved in calling to account members of the former Goss Government
over the illegal shredding of documents relating to child abuse.